Axiomatization of qualitative belief structure
نویسندگان
چکیده
There are important theoretical and practical reasons to study belief structures. Similar to qualitative probability, qualitative belief can also be described in terms of a preference relation. One of the objectives in this study is to specify the precise conditions that a preference relation must satisfy such that it can be faithfully represented by a belief function. Two special classes of preference relations identified are weak and strict belief relations. It is shown that only strict belief relations are consistent (compatible) with belief functions. More importantly, the axiomatization of qualitative belief provides a foundation to develop a utility theory for decision making based on belief functions. The established relationship between qualitative probability and qualitative belief may also lead to a better understanding and useful applications of belief structures in approximate reasoning.
منابع مشابه
A simple modal logic for belief revision
We propose a modal logic based on three operators, representing intial beliefs, information and revised beliefs. Three simple axioms are used to provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the qualitative part of Bayes’ rule. Some theorems of this logic are derived concerning the interaction between current beliefs and future beliefs. Information flows and iterated revision are also discussed.
متن کاملThe Algebra of Multi-Agent Dynamic Belief Revision
We refine our algebraic axiomatization in [8, 9] of epistemic actions and epistemic update (notions defined in [5, 6] using a relational, Kripke-style semantics), to incorporate a mechanism for dynamic belief revision in a multi-agent setting. Our approach has a number of novel features, when compared with traditional belief revision systems such as AGM [2]. Firstly: while traditional belief re...
متن کاملBelief Change with Noisy Sensing and Introspection
We model belief change due to noisy sensing, and belief introspection in the framework of the situation calculus. We give some properties of our axiomatization and show that it does not suffer from the problems with combining sensing, introspection, and plausibility update described in Shapiro et al. [2000].
متن کاملConditional Doxastic Models: A Qualitative Approach to Dynamic Belief Revision
In this paper, we present a semantical approach to multi-agent belief revision and belief update. For this, we introduce relational structures called conditional doxastic models (CDM’s, for short). We show this setting to be equivalent to an epistemic version of the classical AGM Belief Revision theory. We present a logic of conditional beliefs that is complete w.r.t. CDM’s. Moving then to beli...
متن کاملLexicographic Probabilities as Similarity-Weighted Frequencies
How does a decision maker form beliefs from a database of past observations? This paper gives an axiomatization of a decision maker who filters the databases for relevant observations, and forms his belief by similarity-weighted average of the beliefs induced by each relevant observation. This result extends the axiomatization of Billot, Gilboa, Samet and Schmeidler (2005) by endogenizing the s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
دوره 21 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1991